Yesterday I wrote about how consistent votes were across states. I don't want to seem like a conspiracy theorist, but I find it very strange that the % of votes to the winner are so close together. After things like
this http://dougwead.wordpress.com/2012/06/03/war-breaks-out-in-gop/ make me wonder.
(All Numbers are Percents)
The results last night go as followed:
California
Mitt: 79.6
Paul 10.2
Rick 5.2
Newt 3.8
California
McCain: 42
Huckabee 12
Mitt 35
Paul 4
Giuliani 4
Montana
Mitt 68.4
Paul 14.3
Rick 8.9
Newt 4.3
Montana
McCain: 22
Huckabee 15
Mitt 38
Paul 25
Giuliani 0
South Dakota
Mitt 66.1
Paul 13
Rick 11.5
Newt 4
South Dakota
McCain: 70
Huckabee 7
Mitt 3
Paul 17
Giuliani 0
New Jersey
Mitt 81.3
Paul 10.4
Rick 5.2
Newt 3.1
New Jersey
McCain: 55
Huckabee 8
Mitt 28
Paul 5
Giuliani 3
New Mexico
Mitt 73.3
Rick 10.5
Paul 10.3
Newt 5.8
New Mexico
McCain: 86
Huckabee 0
Mitt 0
Paul 14
Giuliani 0
Now lets look at the states from May 22 and May 29
Arkansas
Mitt 69
Paul 11.9
Rick 8
Newt 4.7
Arkansas
McCain: 20
Huckabee 60
Mitt 14
Paul 5
Giuliani 0
Kentucky
Mitt 66.8
Paul 12.5
Rick 8.9
Newt 5.9
Kentucky
McCain: 72
Huckabee 8
Mitt 5
Paul 7
Giuliani 2
Texas
Mitt 69
Paul 11.9
Rick 8
Newt 4.7
Texas
McCain: 51
Huckabee: 38
Mitt: 2
Paul: 5
Giuliani: 0
Maybe I'm just being paranoid, but except for a few cases the numbers look way too consistent.
Lets take the 2008 primary votes separated. They're all over the place with percents.
California
McCain: 42
Huckabee 12
Mitt 35
Paul 4
Giuliani 4
Montana
McCain: 22
Huckabee 15
Mitt 38
Paul 25
Giuliani 0
South Dakota
McCain: 70
Huckabee 7
Mitt 3
Paul 17
Giuliani 0
New Jersey
McCain: 55
Huckabee 8
Mitt 28
Paul 5
Giuliani 3
Also how can someone go from winning 2% of a state losing to Dr. Paul to beating Dr. Paul with 69% of the vote?
this http://dougwead.wordpress.com/2012/06/03/war-breaks-out-in-gop/ make me wonder.
(All Numbers are Percents)
The results last night go as followed:
California
Mitt: 79.6
Paul 10.2
Rick 5.2
Newt 3.8
California
McCain: 42
Huckabee 12
Mitt 35
Paul 4
Giuliani 4
Montana
Mitt 68.4
Paul 14.3
Rick 8.9
Newt 4.3
Montana
McCain: 22
Huckabee 15
Mitt 38
Paul 25
Giuliani 0
South Dakota
Mitt 66.1
Paul 13
Rick 11.5
Newt 4
South Dakota
McCain: 70
Huckabee 7
Mitt 3
Paul 17
Giuliani 0
New Jersey
Mitt 81.3
Paul 10.4
Rick 5.2
Newt 3.1
New Jersey
McCain: 55
Huckabee 8
Mitt 28
Paul 5
Giuliani 3
New Mexico
Mitt 73.3
Rick 10.5
Paul 10.3
Newt 5.8
New Mexico
McCain: 86
Huckabee 0
Mitt 0
Paul 14
Giuliani 0
Now lets look at the states from May 22 and May 29
Arkansas
Mitt 69
Paul 11.9
Rick 8
Newt 4.7
Arkansas
McCain: 20
Huckabee 60
Mitt 14
Paul 5
Giuliani 0
Kentucky
Mitt 66.8
Paul 12.5
Rick 8.9
Newt 5.9
Kentucky
McCain: 72
Huckabee 8
Mitt 5
Paul 7
Giuliani 2
Texas
Mitt 69
Paul 11.9
Rick 8
Newt 4.7
Texas
McCain: 51
Huckabee: 38
Mitt: 2
Paul: 5
Giuliani: 0
Maybe I'm just being paranoid, but except for a few cases the numbers look way too consistent.
Lets take the 2008 primary votes separated. They're all over the place with percents.
California
McCain: 42
Huckabee 12
Mitt 35
Paul 4
Giuliani 4
Montana
McCain: 22
Huckabee 15
Mitt 38
Paul 25
Giuliani 0
South Dakota
McCain: 70
Huckabee 7
Mitt 3
Paul 17
Giuliani 0
New Jersey
McCain: 55
Huckabee 8
Mitt 28
Paul 5
Giuliani 3
Also how can someone go from winning 2% of a state losing to Dr. Paul to beating Dr. Paul with 69% of the vote?





