Yesterday I wrote about how consistent votes were across states. I don't want to seem like a conspiracy theorist, but I find it very strange that the % of votes to the winner are so close together. After things like
this http://dougwead.wordpress.com/2012/06/03/war-breaks-out-in-gop/ make me wonder.
(All Numbers are Percents)
The results last night go as followed:
California
Mitt: 79.6
Paul 10.2
Rick 5.2
Newt 3.8
California
McCain: 42
Huckabee 12
Mitt 35
Paul 4
Giuliani 4
Montana
Mitt 68.4
Paul 14.3
Rick 8.9
Newt 4.3
Montana
McCain: 22
Huckabee 15
Mitt 38
Paul 25
Giuliani 0
South Dakota
Mitt 66.1
Paul 13
Rick 11.5
Newt 4
South Dakota
McCain: 70
Huckabee 7
Mitt 3
Paul 17
Giuliani 0
New Jersey
Mitt 81.3
Paul 10.4
Rick 5.2
Newt 3.1
New Jersey
McCain: 55
Huckabee 8
Mitt 28
Paul 5
Giuliani 3
New Mexico
Mitt 73.3
Rick 10.5
Paul 10.3
Newt 5.8
New Mexico
McCain: 86
Huckabee 0
Mitt 0
Paul 14
Giuliani 0
Now lets look at the states from May 22 and May 29
Arkansas
Mitt 69
Paul 11.9
Rick 8
Newt 4.7
Arkansas
McCain: 20
Huckabee 60
Mitt 14
Paul 5
Giuliani 0
Kentucky
Mitt 66.8
Paul 12.5
Rick 8.9
Newt 5.9
Kentucky
McCain: 72
Huckabee 8
Mitt 5
Paul 7
Giuliani 2
Texas
Mitt 69
Paul 11.9
Rick 8
Newt 4.7
Texas
McCain: 51
Huckabee: 38
Mitt: 2
Paul: 5
Giuliani: 0
Maybe I'm just being paranoid, but except for a few cases the numbers look way too consistent.
Lets take the 2008 primary votes separated. They're all over the place with percents.
California
McCain: 42
Huckabee 12
Mitt 35
Paul 4
Giuliani 4
Montana
McCain: 22
Huckabee 15
Mitt 38
Paul 25
Giuliani 0
South Dakota
McCain: 70
Huckabee 7
Mitt 3
Paul 17
Giuliani 0
New Jersey
McCain: 55
Huckabee 8
Mitt 28
Paul 5
Giuliani 3
Also how can someone go from winning 2% of a state losing to Dr. Paul to beating Dr. Paul with 69% of the vote?
1 Comments:
The votes were flipped. It's painfully obvious to people paying attention, and you can call me a conspiracy nut all you want, but the EVIDENCE says otherwise. Look at this indisputable math. Clearly, the numbers WERE manipulated. There is NO question in the mind of anyone who legitimately examines the evidence. http://www.dailypaul.com/220841/proof-of-election-fraud-algorithm-discovered
Post a Comment